|Order ID: DHT6H23GDHY82HD
|Delivery: 3 HOURS & ABOVE
|Writer Classification: PHD-PROFICIENT
|Formatting Style: APA/HARVARD/MLA
|Plagiarism Grading: 0-0.3%
|Quality Standard: 99.999%
|Course Level: UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE
|Revision Request: ALLOWED
I would like you to reply to this peer discussion post:
It is important to consider wider industry trends when making changes within an organization. This allows for more effective navigation in a changing environment. This necessitates the creation of customized and adjustable change management strategies that take into account cultural, economic, and external elements. There are three levels of management that must be addressed when managing a change: the individual, the team/unit, and the organization. Additionally, effective change requires a careful attention to the process and content of the change (Deszca, 2020).
Various methods for managing organizational change are provided by the six models of change management. First, Lewin’s model is attractive for its simplicity, making it an effective way of explaining the change process to those involved. This model has three phases: first, “unfreezing,” where the need to switch from the current state is apparent; second, “change,” when new methods are adopted; and lastly, “refreeze,” when the alterations have been adopted and a sense of balance is re-established. Secondly, Kotter’s Eight-Step model, leaders should develop a strong sense of urgency and assemble a team of influential individuals to lead the change effort. A vision for the future should be formulated and communicated to all employees. It is critical to give people the authority to take action and remove any obstacles that might hinder the transformation process. Celebrate the accomplishments, keep pushing forward and make sure the new way of doing things is embedded in the company culture.
Thirdly, Gentile’s model encourages individuals to recognize and articulate their moral values, come up with strategies to effectively communicate those values when faced with difficult ethical dilemmas, and practice voicing those values in simulated scenarios. Fourth, Duck’s model takes into account the emotional responses to change. People must first become aware of the need for change, which should be followed by preparing and planning appropriately. Then, new systems should be created and attitudes must be adjusted. After that, people must commit to the process of transformation and eventually they will be able to reap its rewards.
Fifth, Beckhard and Harris’ Change-Management Process is a system that helps organizations bring about change. It starts by contrasting the current situation with the desired future situation, followed by a step-by-step guide for facilitating the transition. The model puts emphasis on managing the transition as the key to making any change project successful. Lastly the Change Path model, complex changes can be managed by taking them through four stages. Firstly, recognizing the need for change, then bridging any gaps, followed by creating a plan of action, and finally, integrating the change and assessing its effectiveness.
In my opinion, the combination of Lewin’s and Kotter’s change management models is the most suitable choice. Lewin’s model is advantageous due to its straightforwardness and emphasis on communication, while Kotter’s model is beneficial because of its structured plan and emphasis on leadership and cultural awareness. Combining these two models provides an equilibrium of solutions that can can successfully deal with the distinct issues and prospects in Saudi Arabia’s business environment.
|FOLLOWING OF INSTRUCTIONS
|NEATNESS AND OTHERS
An essay categorized as excellent demonstrated a profound mastery of the subject matter, coupled with an exceptional ability to organize thoughts coherently. This work showcased a sophisticated understanding of the topic, presenting nuanced arguments with clarity and precision. The structure was impeccable, with a well-defined introduction, body, and conclusion. Critical analysis was evident throughout, reflecting a deep engagement with relevant literature. The essay not only met but exceeded the expected standards, demonstrating a high level of scholarship and intellectual rigor.
An essay categorized as excellent in terms of following instructions demonstrates an exemplary adherence to guidelines. The writer meticulously follows each directive, showcasing a keen attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of the assignment’s requirements. From formatting to specific content criteria, every instruction is not only met but exceeded, reflecting a dedication to precision. Such essays not only fulfill the given parameters but also exhibit a level of thoroughness that goes beyond expectations.
In the classification of “Neatness and Others,” top-tier works exhibit exceptional attention to detail and precision in presentation. These essays are immaculately organized, with a visually appealing layout and a meticulous approach to formatting. Neatness extends to language usage, where clarity and conciseness prevail. Citations and references are flawlessly integrated, showcasing a commitment to academic integrity. These essays go beyond the surface, incorporating additional elements like illustrative visuals or supplementary materials, enhancing the overall quality of presentation.
In the realm of an average essay, a moderate proficiency in the subject matter was observed. While the writer demonstrated a basic understanding of the topic, there were occasional lapses in organization and coherence. Arguments and analysis were presented, but there was room for improvement in terms of depth and clarity. The structure was adequate but lacked the refinement seen in higher-quality essays. Overall, the essay met the basic requirements but fell short of achieving a more polished and insightful presentation.
In the realm of an average essay regarding following instructions, there is a moderate adherence to guidelines. While the writer generally complies with the given instructions, there may be occasional deviations or oversights. The essay meets the basic requirements but lacks the meticulous attention to detail seen in higher-quality submissions. Despite a reasonable attempt to follow instructions, there is room for improvement in terms of ensuring a more precise alignment with the provided guidelines.
Essays falling into the average category regarding “Neatness and Others” demonstrate a moderate level of attention to detail. The organization is generally tidy, but there may be occasional lapses in formatting or presentation. Language usage is adequate, although there is room for improvement in terms of clarity and conciseness. Citations and references are appropriately included, but not with the finesse seen in higher-quality works. While meeting basic standards, these essays lack the polish and meticulousness associated with top-tier neatness.
An essay categorized as good quality displayed a solid understanding of the subject matter. The writer effectively communicated their ideas, presenting a coherent and well-organized piece of work. While not reaching the level of excellence, this essay exhibited a commendable effort in critical analysis and argumentation. The structure was generally sound, with a clear introduction, development of ideas in the body, and a reasonable conclusion. With minor enhancements in depth and refinement, this essay had the potential to elevate to a higher quality.
An essay categorized as good quality in following instructions displays a solid effort in adhering to guidelines. The writer demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the given instructions, with overall compliance. While there may be some minor lapses, the essay generally meets the specified criteria. With a bit more attention to detail and precision in following instructions, these essays have the potential to elevate to a higher quality in terms of adherence to guidelines.
In the realm of “Good Quality” for Neatness and Others, essays display a solid effort in organization and presentation. The layout is generally tidy, with a clear structure and acceptable formatting. Language usage is effective, though some areas may benefit from increased clarity. Citations and references are included appropriately, though not with the precision seen in top-tier works. With minor refinements in organization and attention to detail, these essays have the potential to enhance their overall neatness and move towards a higher quality classification.