|Order ID: DHT6H23GDHY82HD
|Delivery: 3 HOURS & ABOVE
|Writer Classification: PHD-PROFICIENT
|Formatting Style: APA/HARVARD/MLA
|Plagiarism Grading: 0-0.3%
|Quality Standard: 99.999%
|Course Level: UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE
|Revision Request: ALLOWED
You must complete Assessments 1–5 before beginning this assessment.
For this assessment, submit your final operations improvement plan (OIP). In the assessments you have completed thus far, you have submitted drafts of each of the components of an OIP. Take time now to update the work you have already completed with the information and understanding you have gained throughout the course. Take into consideration all of the research and groundwork you have completed along the way. Incorporate feedback from previous assessments as well as the tools, techniques, and methodologies you have examined throughout the course. Finalize your comprehensive OIP as if you were to present it as a formal recommendation to the organizational leaders of the Toyota Motor Corporation. Focus your writing appropriately for that audience. Make sure each piece of your OIP fits together and supports the other elements.
Your final OIP should include the following elements:
A problem statement, including an overview of the Toyota recall crisis, with a brief history and description of the situation.
A description of the key challenge or problem you have chosen to address in Toyota’s organizational processes and an analysis of its organizational impact, based on theories and models of global operations management.
An executive summary of the collected and processed data (actual data, if possible, or assumed data, if necessary).
A cost-benefit analysis based on your data.
A description of your innovative and sustainable solution that reflects strategic global operations management concepts and practices.
Your recommendations for supporting the improvement of the selected process, based on practices of global operations management.
An explanation of the data or findings that validate your recommendations.
The visual tools that you developed to support and integrate your analysis into general business management planning and decision-making processes.
A comprehensive references list.
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Format resources and citations according to APA style and formatting.
Length of paper: 8–10 typed, double-spaced pages plus appendices and reference list.
Font and font-size: Times New Roman, 12 points.
Note: Please review and update the cause-and-effect diagram and process flowchart in each assessment.
Combine these elements to create a complete, integrated operations improvement plan, with each piece working together to support your plan.
|FOLLOWING OF INSTRUCTIONS
|NEATNESS AND OTHERS
An essay categorized as excellent demonstrated a profound mastery of the subject matter, coupled with an exceptional ability to organize thoughts coherently. This work showcased a sophisticated understanding of the topic, presenting nuanced arguments with clarity and precision. The structure was impeccable, with a well-defined introduction, body, and conclusion. Critical analysis was evident throughout, reflecting a deep engagement with relevant literature. The essay not only met but exceeded the expected standards, demonstrating a high level of scholarship and intellectual rigor.
An essay categorized as excellent in terms of following instructions demonstrates an exemplary adherence to guidelines. The writer meticulously follows each directive, showcasing a keen attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of the assignment’s requirements. From formatting to specific content criteria, every instruction is not only met but exceeded, reflecting a dedication to precision. Such essays not only fulfill the given parameters but also exhibit a level of thoroughness that goes beyond expectations.
In the classification of “Neatness and Others,” top-tier works exhibit exceptional attention to detail and precision in presentation. These essays are immaculately organized, with a visually appealing layout and a meticulous approach to formatting. Neatness extends to language usage, where clarity and conciseness prevail. Citations and references are flawlessly integrated, showcasing a commitment to academic integrity. These essays go beyond the surface, incorporating additional elements like illustrative visuals or supplementary materials, enhancing the overall quality of presentation.
In the realm of an average essay, a moderate proficiency in the subject matter was observed. While the writer demonstrated a basic understanding of the topic, there were occasional lapses in organization and coherence. Arguments and analysis were presented, but there was room for improvement in terms of depth and clarity. The structure was adequate but lacked the refinement seen in higher-quality essays. Overall, the essay met the basic requirements but fell short of achieving a more polished and insightful presentation.
In the realm of an average essay regarding following instructions, there is a moderate adherence to guidelines. While the writer generally complies with the given instructions, there may be occasional deviations or oversights. The essay meets the basic requirements but lacks the meticulous attention to detail seen in higher-quality submissions. Despite a reasonable attempt to follow instructions, there is room for improvement in terms of ensuring a more precise alignment with the provided guidelines.
Essays falling into the average category regarding “Neatness and Others” demonstrate a moderate level of attention to detail. The organization is generally tidy, but there may be occasional lapses in formatting or presentation. Language usage is adequate, although there is room for improvement in terms of clarity and conciseness. Citations and references are appropriately included, but not with the finesse seen in higher-quality works. While meeting basic standards, these essays lack the polish and meticulousness associated with top-tier neatness.
An essay categorized as good quality displayed a solid understanding of the subject matter. The writer effectively communicated their ideas, presenting a coherent and well-organized piece of work. While not reaching the level of excellence, this essay exhibited a commendable effort in critical analysis and argumentation. The structure was generally sound, with a clear introduction, development of ideas in the body, and a reasonable conclusion. With minor enhancements in depth and refinement, this essay had the potential to elevate to a higher quality.
An essay categorized as good quality in following instructions displays a solid effort in adhering to guidelines. The writer demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the given instructions, with overall compliance. While there may be some minor lapses, the essay generally meets the specified criteria. With a bit more attention to detail and precision in following instructions, these essays have the potential to elevate to a higher quality in terms of adherence to guidelines.
In the realm of “Good Quality” for Neatness and Others, essays display a solid effort in organization and presentation. The layout is generally tidy, with a clear structure and acceptable formatting. Language usage is effective, though some areas may benefit from increased clarity. Citations and references are included appropriately, though not with the precision seen in top-tier works. With minor refinements in organization and attention to detail, these essays have the potential to enhance their overall neatness and move towards a higher quality classification.