|Order ID: DHT6H23GDHY82HD
|Delivery: 3 HOURS & ABOVE
|Writer Classification: PHD-PROFICIENT
|Formatting Style: APA/HARVARD/MLA
|Plagiarism Grading: 0-0.3%
|Quality Standard: 99.999%
|Course Level: UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE
|Revision Request: ALLOWED
PHIL 122 American River College Aristotle Politics Response
This is a graded discussion: 10 points possibledue Jul 21Week 2 Posts – 2 Set 2From PHIL 122-0111 unread reply.11 reply.Students must write a discussion post entry for their Canvas discussion group on any reading assigned for the week in which the post is due raising an objection against an author. This is for a completion grade and is practice for you to develop your own ideas and objections. The grading rubric only will be on whether you satisfy the sentence count requirement, write out the opponent’s claim, and if you attempt an original objection against the relevant writer. You won’t be graded on whether your objection is a good or bad one. See this as an exercise where you have the freedom without worry to develop your ideas and think for yourself, which are important traits in life. Become the best version of yourself. It’s as if you were raising your hand in class to make a comment, where your grade won’t be affected by the correctness of your comment. It’s merely a completion or participation grade.Students have freedom in determining what they want to write about within the cycle. This is due by Wednesday 1159PM of the week and will be out of 6 points/week. Students must also write a separate response entry that responds to a fellow student’s comment in the group. This second entry is due by Friday at 11:59PM of that week and will be out of an additional 4 points/week. The first post should try to provide a good original criticism of the reading. It must be a minimum of 7 clear sentences with all substance. Start off by stating the claim made by an author that you will object against. Then provide your objection against the author with depth and clarity. You need to title the first post as “1st Post.”The second post should try to provide a good original objection specifically against a fellow student’s idea in your group. It must be a new objection. Do not object to a philosopher that the student is talking about. Rather, you must object against the student’s idea or conclusion. For example, if a student writes a post on Plato. Don’t object against Plato. Rather, object against what the student said about Plato. The post must be a minimum of 4 clear sentences with all substance. You need to title your second post as “2nd Post.” Begin the post by fully writing out the claim made by a fellow student you’re countering. For both posts, good original reasons should be given to justify one’s claim. Posts should try to carry depth, originality, detail, and insight. This takes patience, time, and careful thought. Most good posts exceed well past the sentence count minimums.Click ‘Reply’ to enter your 1st post. For your 2nd post, stay within the same discussion post link, and click ‘Reply’ corresponding to the relevant student post you want to respond to.Canvas only allows me to display one deadline, so the Friday deadline is listed on Canvas. Yet, rest assured, there’s also a Wednesday deadline.Rubric 1st PostLength – 2 pt; Writing out the opponent’s claim – 1 pt; Writing an original objection on a relevant writing – 3 ptsRubric 2nd PostLength – 1 pt; Writing out the opponent’s claim – 1 pt; Writing an original objection on a relevant writing – 2 pts
|FOLLOWING OF INSTRUCTIONS
|NEATNESS AND OTHERS
An essay categorized as excellent demonstrated a profound mastery of the subject matter, coupled with an exceptional ability to organize thoughts coherently. This work showcased a sophisticated understanding of the topic, presenting nuanced arguments with clarity and precision. The structure was impeccable, with a well-defined introduction, body, and conclusion. Critical analysis was evident throughout, reflecting a deep engagement with relevant literature. The essay not only met but exceeded the expected standards, demonstrating a high level of scholarship and intellectual rigor.
An essay categorized as excellent in terms of following instructions demonstrates an exemplary adherence to guidelines. The writer meticulously follows each directive, showcasing a keen attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of the assignment’s requirements. From formatting to specific content criteria, every instruction is not only met but exceeded, reflecting a dedication to precision. Such essays not only fulfill the given parameters but also exhibit a level of thoroughness that goes beyond expectations.
In the classification of “Neatness and Others,” top-tier works exhibit exceptional attention to detail and precision in presentation. These essays are immaculately organized, with a visually appealing layout and a meticulous approach to formatting. Neatness extends to language usage, where clarity and conciseness prevail. Citations and references are flawlessly integrated, showcasing a commitment to academic integrity. These essays go beyond the surface, incorporating additional elements like illustrative visuals or supplementary materials, enhancing the overall quality of presentation.
In the realm of an average essay, a moderate proficiency in the subject matter was observed. While the writer demonstrated a basic understanding of the topic, there were occasional lapses in organization and coherence. Arguments and analysis were presented, but there was room for improvement in terms of depth and clarity. The structure was adequate but lacked the refinement seen in higher-quality essays. Overall, the essay met the basic requirements but fell short of achieving a more polished and insightful presentation.
In the realm of an average essay regarding following instructions, there is a moderate adherence to guidelines. While the writer generally complies with the given instructions, there may be occasional deviations or oversights. The essay meets the basic requirements but lacks the meticulous attention to detail seen in higher-quality submissions. Despite a reasonable attempt to follow instructions, there is room for improvement in terms of ensuring a more precise alignment with the provided guidelines.
Essays falling into the average category regarding “Neatness and Others” demonstrate a moderate level of attention to detail. The organization is generally tidy, but there may be occasional lapses in formatting or presentation. Language usage is adequate, although there is room for improvement in terms of clarity and conciseness. Citations and references are appropriately included, but not with the finesse seen in higher-quality works. While meeting basic standards, these essays lack the polish and meticulousness associated with top-tier neatness.
An essay categorized as good quality displayed a solid understanding of the subject matter. The writer effectively communicated their ideas, presenting a coherent and well-organized piece of work. While not reaching the level of excellence, this essay exhibited a commendable effort in critical analysis and argumentation. The structure was generally sound, with a clear introduction, development of ideas in the body, and a reasonable conclusion. With minor enhancements in depth and refinement, this essay had the potential to elevate to a higher quality.
An essay categorized as good quality in following instructions displays a solid effort in adhering to guidelines. The writer demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the given instructions, with overall compliance. While there may be some minor lapses, the essay generally meets the specified criteria. With a bit more attention to detail and precision in following instructions, these essays have the potential to elevate to a higher quality in terms of adherence to guidelines.
In the realm of “Good Quality” for Neatness and Others, essays display a solid effort in organization and presentation. The layout is generally tidy, with a clear structure and acceptable formatting. Language usage is effective, though some areas may benefit from increased clarity. Citations and references are included appropriately, though not with the precision seen in top-tier works. With minor refinements in organization and attention to detail, these essays have the potential to enhance their overall neatness and move towards a higher quality classification.