GCU Bioethics Discussion paper
Order ID: DHT6H23GDHY82HD Delivery: 3 HOURS & ABOVE Writer Classification: PHD-PROFICIENT Formatting Style: APA/HARVARD/MLA Plagiarism Grading: 0-0.3% Quality Standard: 99.999% Sources: 3-7 Course Level: UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE Revision Request: ALLOWED
GCU Bioethics Discussion paper
Being a human is truly a gift from God. Life is priceless and in today’s society I feel that people take that for granted. In bioethics issues my world view remains the same that life is priceless but I do not believe that anyone should be judged for their choices because God’s judgment is the only one that matters. With that being said, I truly am pro-life because every life matters regardless of the circumstance. I do however believe it is not my place to judge or decide for others because I am not in their position. I do not personally believe that abortion should really be an option, but at the same time I understand there are circumstances where some people may really feel they have no other option. For example, a rape victim becomes pregnant. I have no right to decide whether or not she should carry a baby.
Meilaender follows the words of Leon Kass to help us picture the differentiation between procreation and reproduction. According to Kass, “The premodern Christian Englishspeaking world, impressed with the world as given by a Creator, using the term “procreation.” Meilaender promotes throughout the reading that, procreation is natural and has a divine influence while reproduction (assisted reproduction especially) is unnatural and disturbs God’s divine plan. Meilaender states that a child begotten, not made, symbolizes the union of the mother and father. Being begotten isn’t simply a 50/50 reproduction of the mother and father but, “the power of their mutual love has given rise to another who, though different from them and equal in dignity to them, manifests in his person the love that unites them” (Meilaender, 2013, p. 15).
Reflecting on Meilaender’s distinction of procreation versus reproduction and being begotten versus being made, I find myself agreeing halfway with him concerning procreation and being begotten. Across all continents, cultures, races, and religions you find the procreating is normally a time of joy and celebration and a nod towards a higher power, God, and for the continuation of human life. I also agree with how Meilaender describes being begotten – the child symbolizes the union and love of the mother and father. Even Meilaender using the Christian view that God gave his only begotten son, Jesus, who was proof of God’s love for us makes complete sense because it agrees with the Christian background that I was raised with. The only thing I’m not too sure I agree with is how Meilaender describes assisted reproduction so negatively. He takes a tone of ‘it’s not natural, so don’t do it, it must not be God’s will. To me that’s true love the lengths this couple put themselves through to create these babies.
Leon R. Kass, M.D., Toward a More Natural Science (New York: The Free Press, 1985), p.48.
Meilaender, G. (2013). Bioethics: A Primer for Christians (3rd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
|FOLLOWING OF INSTRUCTIONS
|NEATNESS AND OTHERS
An essay categorized as excellent demonstrated a profound mastery of the subject matter, coupled with an exceptional ability to organize thoughts coherently. This work showcased a sophisticated understanding of the topic, presenting nuanced arguments with clarity and precision. The structure was impeccable, with a well-defined introduction, body, and conclusion. Critical analysis was evident throughout, reflecting a deep engagement with relevant literature. The essay not only met but exceeded the expected standards, demonstrating a high level of scholarship and intellectual rigor.
An essay categorized as excellent in terms of following instructions demonstrates an exemplary adherence to guidelines. The writer meticulously follows each directive, showcasing a keen attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of the assignment’s requirements. From formatting to specific content criteria, every instruction is not only met but exceeded, reflecting a dedication to precision. Such essays not only fulfill the given parameters but also exhibit a level of thoroughness that goes beyond expectations.
In the classification of “Neatness and Others,” top-tier works exhibit exceptional attention to detail and precision in presentation. These essays are immaculately organized, with a visually appealing layout and a meticulous approach to formatting. Neatness extends to language usage, where clarity and conciseness prevail. Citations and references are flawlessly integrated, showcasing a commitment to academic integrity. These essays go beyond the surface, incorporating additional elements like illustrative visuals or supplementary materials, enhancing the overall quality of presentation.
In the realm of an average essay, a moderate proficiency in the subject matter was observed. While the writer demonstrated a basic understanding of the topic, there were occasional lapses in organization and coherence. Arguments and analysis were presented, but there was room for improvement in terms of depth and clarity. The structure was adequate but lacked the refinement seen in higher-quality essays. Overall, the essay met the basic requirements but fell short of achieving a more polished and insightful presentation.
In the realm of an average essay regarding following instructions, there is a moderate adherence to guidelines. While the writer generally complies with the given instructions, there may be occasional deviations or oversights. The essay meets the basic requirements but lacks the meticulous attention to detail seen in higher-quality submissions. Despite a reasonable attempt to follow instructions, there is room for improvement in terms of ensuring a more precise alignment with the provided guidelines.
Essays falling into the average category regarding “Neatness and Others” demonstrate a moderate level of attention to detail. The organization is generally tidy, but there may be occasional lapses in formatting or presentation. Language usage is adequate, although there is room for improvement in terms of clarity and conciseness. Citations and references are appropriately included, but not with the finesse seen in higher-quality works. While meeting basic standards, these essays lack the polish and meticulousness associated with top-tier neatness.
An essay categorized as good quality displayed a solid understanding of the subject matter. The writer effectively communicated their ideas, presenting a coherent and well-organized piece of work. While not reaching the level of excellence, this essay exhibited a commendable effort in critical analysis and argumentation. The structure was generally sound, with a clear introduction, development of ideas in the body, and a reasonable conclusion. With minor enhancements in depth and refinement, this essay had the potential to elevate to a higher quality.
An essay categorized as good quality in following instructions displays a solid effort in adhering to guidelines. The writer demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the given instructions, with overall compliance. While there may be some minor lapses, the essay generally meets the specified criteria. With a bit more attention to detail and precision in following instructions, these essays have the potential to elevate to a higher quality in terms of adherence to guidelines.
In the realm of “Good Quality” for Neatness and Others, essays display a solid effort in organization and presentation. The layout is generally tidy, with a clear structure and acceptable formatting. Language usage is effective, though some areas may benefit from increased clarity. Citations and references are included appropriately, though not with the precision seen in top-tier works. With minor refinements in organization and attention to detail, these essays have the potential to enhance their overall neatness and move towards a higher quality classification.