Order ID: DHT6H23GDHY82HD Delivery: 3 HOURS & ABOVE Writer Classification: PHD-PROFICIENT Formatting Style: APA/HARVARD/MLA Plagiarism Grading: 0-0.3% Quality Standard: 99.999% Sources: 3-7 Course Level: UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE Revision Request: ALLOWED
19. Which of the following papillary lesions are NOT treated by total excision?
A. Atypical papilloma
B. Sclerosing papillomas
E. None of the above
20. Which of the following is/are TRUE regarding atypical papillomas?
A. Papillary processes contain focal areas that consist of a proliferation of monotonous cells identical to the cells of
low-grade, nonnecrotic DCIS.
B. A myoepithelial cell layer may or may not be present.
C. The atypical areas of proliferation occupy <l/3 of the lesion.
D. S100 and muscle-specific actin will confirm presence or absence of myoepithelial cells.
E. All of the above.
21. Papillary carcinoma of the breast:
A. Represents 8% of all breast carcinomas
B. Does not occur in the male breast
C. Shares the same molecular alterations as papillary carcinoma of the thyroid, ovary and lung
D. Shows <25% ER positivity; most are HER-2/neu amplified
E. Exhibits 10%-15% p53 positivity
22. Regarding lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), which of the following is FALSE?
A. It is typically found as an incidental finding in a breast biopsy performed on a proliferative lesion.
B. It rarely, if ever, produces a palpable mass.
C. It tends to be multifocal and multicentric (45%-95%) and bilateral (50%-60%).
D. Patients have a significant risk of developing an invasive carcinoma (not necessarily invasive lobular carcinoma).
E. The average age at diagnosis is 65 years.
23. Which of the following is TRUE regarding the immunohistochemistry for lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS)?
A. Neoplastic cells usually are positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors.
B. Basal lamina surrounding acinar units is negative for collagen type IV.
C. Tumor cells typically demonstrate HER-2/neu (C-erb B-2) amplification (overexpression).
D. Actin will confirm the absence of myoepithelial cells.
E. Tumor cells are positive for E-cadherin.
24. Which of the following is NOT a biphasic tumor?
B. Juvenile fibroadenoma
C. Phyllodes rumor
D. Metaplastic carcinoma
E. All of the above are biphasic rumors.
25. In the differential diagnosis of juvenile fibroadenoma versus phyllodes tumor, which of the following favors phyllodes
A. It is usually seen between ages of 20 and 30 years of age.
B. It is the most common breast lesion in adolescent girls.
C. The stroma is more cellular with leaf.like processes, and very rarely demonstrates a pericanalicular (random or
concentric) growth pattern.
D. The ducts are engulfed by a pericanalicular (random or concentric) arrangement of cellular stroma.
E. The stroma is usually much more dense and cellular than that seen in the adult type fibroadenoma.
ASCP Quick Compendium Companion for Surgical Pathology
4: Breast Questions
26. Which of the following is NOT a morphologic characteristic of phyllodes tumor?
A. High-grade tumors have a hypercellular stroma, 5 or more mitotic figures/IO hpf, moderate to severe stromal atypia,
and infiltrating margins.
B. Tumors are classified as benign, low-grade (potential for local recurrence), and high-grade (potential to metastasize).
|FOLLOWING OF INSTRUCTIONS
|NEATNESS AND OTHERS
An essay categorized as excellent demonstrated a profound mastery of the subject matter, coupled with an exceptional ability to organize thoughts coherently. This work showcased a sophisticated understanding of the topic, presenting nuanced arguments with clarity and precision. The structure was impeccable, with a well-defined introduction, body, and conclusion. Critical analysis was evident throughout, reflecting a deep engagement with relevant literature. The essay not only met but exceeded the expected standards, demonstrating a high level of scholarship and intellectual rigor.
An essay categorized as excellent in terms of following instructions demonstrates an exemplary adherence to guidelines. The writer meticulously follows each directive, showcasing a keen attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of the assignment’s requirements. From formatting to specific content criteria, every instruction is not only met but exceeded, reflecting a dedication to precision. Such essays not only fulfill the given parameters but also exhibit a level of thoroughness that goes beyond expectations.
In the classification of “Neatness and Others,” top-tier works exhibit exceptional attention to detail and precision in presentation. These essays are immaculately organized, with a visually appealing layout and a meticulous approach to formatting. Neatness extends to language usage, where clarity and conciseness prevail. Citations and references are flawlessly integrated, showcasing a commitment to academic integrity. These essays go beyond the surface, incorporating additional elements like illustrative visuals or supplementary materials, enhancing the overall quality of presentation.
In the realm of an average essay, a moderate proficiency in the subject matter was observed. While the writer demonstrated a basic understanding of the topic, there were occasional lapses in organization and coherence. Arguments and analysis were presented, but there was room for improvement in terms of depth and clarity. The structure was adequate but lacked the refinement seen in higher-quality essays. Overall, the essay met the basic requirements but fell short of achieving a more polished and insightful presentation.
In the realm of an average essay regarding following instructions, there is a moderate adherence to guidelines. While the writer generally complies with the given instructions, there may be occasional deviations or oversights. The essay meets the basic requirements but lacks the meticulous attention to detail seen in higher-quality submissions. Despite a reasonable attempt to follow instructions, there is room for improvement in terms of ensuring a more precise alignment with the provided guidelines.
Essays falling into the average category regarding “Neatness and Others” demonstrate a moderate level of attention to detail. The organization is generally tidy, but there may be occasional lapses in formatting or presentation. Language usage is adequate, although there is room for improvement in terms of clarity and conciseness. Citations and references are appropriately included, but not with the finesse seen in higher-quality works. While meeting basic standards, these essays lack the polish and meticulousness associated with top-tier neatness.
An essay categorized as good quality displayed a solid understanding of the subject matter. The writer effectively communicated their ideas, presenting a coherent and well-organized piece of work. While not reaching the level of excellence, this essay exhibited a commendable effort in critical analysis and argumentation. The structure was generally sound, with a clear introduction, development of ideas in the body, and a reasonable conclusion. With minor enhancements in depth and refinement, this essay had the potential to elevate to a higher quality.
An essay categorized as good quality in following instructions displays a solid effort in adhering to guidelines. The writer demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the given instructions, with overall compliance. While there may be some minor lapses, the essay generally meets the specified criteria. With a bit more attention to detail and precision in following instructions, these essays have the potential to elevate to a higher quality in terms of adherence to guidelines.
In the realm of “Good Quality” for Neatness and Others, essays display a solid effort in organization and presentation. The layout is generally tidy, with a clear structure and acceptable formatting. Language usage is effective, though some areas may benefit from increased clarity. Citations and references are included appropriately, though not with the precision seen in top-tier works. With minor refinements in organization and attention to detail, these essays have the potential to enhance their overall neatness and move towards a higher quality classification.