Apply organizational and systems leadership concepts to promote quality patient care. (Max 38 points)
Value: none
Explanation:
Beginner
Two or more of the criteria is addressed.
Improving
One of the criteria is not addressed: Either accreditation standard , leadership concepts or institutional support is not addressed.
Competent
Standards, leadership concept or institutional impact lack the supporting information.
Expert
Clarity is lacking in the identification of standards, leadership concepts and institutional impact.
Master
Clearly addresses standards, leadership concepts and institutional impact.
Evaluate performance improvement processes designed for the purpose of providing quality patient care. (Max 30 points)
Value: none
Explanation:
Beginner
Interprofessional plan, organizational perspective, culture, population or outcomes not evident.
Improving
One or more of the criteria is not addressed: interprofessional plan, organizational perspective, culture, population or outcomes.
Competent
Support is lacking in the interprofessional plan, failure to incorporate organization perspective, cultural aspect, defined population and/or desired outcomes.
Expert
Clarity is lacking in the interprofessional plan.
Master
Interprofessional Plan encompasses an organizational, culturally appropriate perspective with clearly defined population and desired outcomes.
Apply research outcomes and evidence-based practice to recommendations for improved patient care. (Max 30 points)
Value: none
Explanation:
Beginner
No correlation is evident between the implementation process and/or theory.
Improving
Justification for selection of the implementation process and/or theory is not addressed.
Competent
Justification for selection of the implementation process and use of theory is unclear.
Expert
Clarity is lacking on the implementation, Evidenced-Based Practice (EBP) and use of Lewin’s Theory.
Master
Implementation process is based on outcomes and recommendations based on evidenced based practice utilizing Lewin’s Theory of Change.
ynthesize health policy processes established for the advocacy of quality healthcare. (Max 30 points)
Value: none
Explanation:
Beginner
Statements lacks congruency or application with the organization’s need.
Improving
Plan is not addressed as to how it fits within the organization.
Competent
Plan is mentioned but not clearly developed.
Expert
Identification is not clear as to how it fits within the organization.
Master
Thoroughly presented a plan to address the identified cultural challenge with impact clearly stated.
Spelling, Grammar, APA format; 6-8 pages excluding title and reference pages. (Max 22 points)
Value: none
Explanation:
Beginner
APA style is not evident. (13 points or less)
Improving
More than 5 spelling or grammatical errors. More than 6 errors in APA formatting. (13.5 to 16.2 points)
Competent
4-5 spelling or grammatical errors. 4-6 errors in APA formatting. (16.43-17.78 points)
Expert
1-2 spelling or grammatical errors. Less than 4 errors in APA formatting. (18-20.03 points)
Master
No spelling or grammatical errors. Less than 2 errors in APA formatting. (20.25-22.5 points)